As there were no specified readings for Week 10,
I have gone back and reflected on some from past weeks which had been assigned
multiple readings. This week’s reflection is on the reading Tsunami Warnings,
Written in Stone by M. Fackler, assigned to Week 2.
The reading is about “tsunami stones” situated
along the coastline of Japan that mark the extent of inland destruction caused
by past tsunamis. They stand as a reminder to future generations of the
devastation made possible my tsunamis and warn not to build any lower than
where the stones have been positioned.
However, as time goes on, the article notes that
modern day Japan has become ignorant to the warnings of these stones and the
message of their ancestors. Development spreads into low-lying areas, seawalls
are built taller and reliance is put on advancing technology to quell Mother
Nature. It was proposed by Masayuki Oishi that modern versions of these tsunami
stones are needed.
This reading reminded me of the January 2011
Brisbane floods and the consequential debates that followed regarding the
buying back of river side properties by the council and redeveloping them into
recreational park lands or sporting grounds. A lot of conversations/discussions
with peers, families and friends brought up similar viewpoints regarding the
same issue of the inclination of future generations to forget what has happened
in the past. Many of the people I spoke to seemed to believe that, although
house prices in flood prone areas have decreased substantially, they are bound
to rise again as the generations go on.
In this case, I believe there is a need for a
“modern day tsunami stone” not only in Japan, but also in Brisbane and every
other city prone to natural disasters. Although I admire the simplicity and straightforward
message of the tsunami stones, I believe with the evolution of the way we live
and the way messages are now conveyed in the virtual and digital sense, simple
messages such as those of the stones can be so easily overlooked in today’s
world. As also mentioned in the article, a heavy reliance on technology to
prevent and repair everything will also eventually be out down fall.
What could be Brisbane’s version of the tsunami
stones? Wivenhoe Dam was supposed to stand as a reminder of the destruction of
the 1974 floods but how well did it remind us? Is changing legislation enough?
What happens when the next generation is in charge of determining this legislation?
No comments:
Post a Comment