The reading “Shearing Layers” by S. Brand in How buildings learn: What happens after
they’re built? begins by discussing the initial marketing of Architectural
Digest as an architectural magazine and its evolution towards focusing on the
interior. A general perception by heads of the magazine that readers revamped
the interiors of their homes more often than the exterior led to this change in
focus. In discussing this change, the author elaborates upon the concept of
buildings fundamentally consisting of layers, all of which possess varying life
spans.
I found this concept to be very interesting. I believe that
looking at a building/space in terms of layers changes how one would approach
the design of it, how an owner would look at renovating/renting it, how a real
estate agent would approach selling it, etc. as opposed to viewing a
building/space in the traditional sense. From a business perspective, it was
mentioned in the article that an architectural firm attempted to keep long term
clients by approaching their projects from a time perspective – the use of the
building over time.
This ties back into previous blog posts of previous readings
which high lighted the need for adaptable architecture - architecture that can
change with the needs and wants of the users over time. I believe this could be
made possible if architects and building designers were more aware of the
varying longevity of different parts of the building from the early stages of
design.
The reading made a good point in noting that adaptable
architecture allows growth but growth can come in varying forms. Architecture
that inhibits good growth in terms of adaptability and improvement in aesthetic
shortens its longevity. The reading noted that “graceless turnover” is the
opposite of adaption.
No comments:
Post a Comment